METADATA


Title: To use “he/she” or “they”: That is the question.

 

Vol. 10(3), 2022, pp. 51-65.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.46687/KEGQ9804

 

Author: Cătălina Bălinișteanu-Furdu

About the author: Cătălina Bălinișteanu-Furdu is a Senior Lecturer at the Foreign Languages Department, “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacău, Romania. Sie graduated “Al. I. Cuza” University of Iași where, in 2011, she also defended her PhD thesis (“Die Frau in Heinrich Manns Frühwerk”) – coordinated by Prof. PhD., Dr. h. c. Andrei Hoișie-Corbea. She attended courses at University of Konstanz with an Erasmus scholarship in 2000-2001, where she came back in 2008 for a research scholarship. Her teaching activity comprises also different teaching staff mobility programs at University of Bordeaux III (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015), and University of Wroclaw (2008) and University of Montenegro (2022) where she taught Victorian literature and held lectures on the English Renaissance, as well as on Gender Studies. She has participated in more than 40 national and international conferences (in Romania and France, Ukraine, and Moldova) and published over 50 papers and articles in scientific journals/reviews.

e-mail: balinisteanu.catalina@ub.ro;

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Catalina-Balinisteanu-Furdu

 

 

Citation (APA style): Bălinișteanu-Furdu, C. (2022). To use “he/she” or “they”: That is the question. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 10(3), 51-65. http://doi.org/10.46687/KEGQ9804..

 

Link: http://silc.fhn-shu.com/issues/2022-3/ SILC_2022_Vol_10_Issue_3_051-065_15.pdf

 

Abstract: This paper aims to underline the close connection between language and culture. Linguistic interaction is not only a series of sentences from a speaker to a hearer, but it also involves the cultural context which influences the interactants either to use political correctness or not. In recent years, native speakers as well as English teachers have been forced to deal with the abundance of terminology contrived so that people would not be offended by a ‘biased’ language which ignores/rejects their gender, ethnic origin, or sexual orientation. We try to show how sometimes an ‘unbiased’ language can have comic implications from a lexical-semantic point of view, but the goal of this discussion is to point out or even eliminate certain inequalities in society and to make the students understand these word-creations. The last part of this paper examines a questionnaire given to Romanian students which is meant to be a survey of their attitude towards the use of language with political correctness. The findings reveal the students’ opinions on gender, on societal restrictions and on (ab-)using language.

Keywords: political correctness, sexist language, equality, discriminatory practices, gender identity terms  

 

References:

  1. Burridge, K., & Keith, A. (1991). Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Curzan, A. (2014). Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107327.
  3. Delekta, I. (2019). Political correctness and linguistic creativity in the job market. How much do they (mis)inform? Revista Internacional de Organizaciones, 23(December), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.17345/rio23.149-165.
  4. Donahue, R. (2022, June 20). J. Lo Says Happy Pride. Jennifer Lopez Introduced Her Child Emme with They/Them Pronouns During a Recent Performance. Allure. https://www.allure.com/story/jennifer-lopez-introduced-child-emme-they-them-pronouns.
  5. Henni, J. (2022, August 23). Meghan Markle Started Feeling a ‘Negative Connotation’ of the Word ‘Ambitious’ When Dating Prince Harry. People. https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-prince-harry-negative-connotation-ambition-archetypes-podcast/.
  6. Pinta, J. A., & Yakubu, J. D. (2014). Language Use and Political Correctness for Peaceful Coexistence: Implications for Sustainable Development. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4, 79-86.
  7. Plančić, B., Zanchi, Ž., & Čudić, M. (2018). Political Correctness – Maintaining a Balanced View. Transactions on Maritime Science. pp. 56-59. https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v02.n01.008.
  8. Shedrack, G. B. (2004). Introduction to Peace and Conflict Studies in West Africa. Spectrum Books Limited.
  9. Stein, S. (2016, February 5). Commenting on a BBC series “Mystery”. The Paris Review. https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2016/02/05/mystery/.
  10. Talbot, M. (2007). ‘Political correctness’ and freedom of speech. M. Hellinger & A. Pauwels (eds.), Language and communication: diversity and change (pp. 751-763). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198539.4.751.
  11. Tokarev, V. (2016). Political Correctness. Language Change from Above (pp. 1-22). Grin Verlag. Retrieved July 22, 2022 from www.grin.com/document/382469.
  12. Tsykalyuk, I. V., & Shchukina, O. A. (2019). Political Correctness as a Sociocultural and Linguistic Phenomenon in Modern English, pp. 225-231. Retrieved July 17, 2022 from https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/72021/1/978-5-91256-441-3_2019_040.pdf.
  13. Zhou, Li-na. (2018). Political correctness in American English and its implication in TEFL. Sino-US English Teaching, 15(2), 65-69. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2018.02.002.