METADATA
Title: Diversity and impact of national culture on undergraduate students’ learning styles
Vol. 2, 2017, pp. 139-151.
DOI: 10.46687/SILC.2017.v02.012
Author: Nedka Dimitrova
About the author: Assistant Professor Nedka Dimitrova, PhD received a PhD in Linguistics and MA in English studies and Mass communications at Konstantin Preslavsky University of Shumen. Her main areas of research interest and publications are on the subject of intercultural communication with a focus on cultural differences and their impact on the process of thinking and learning in higher education settings. Nedka Dimitrova has a long-standing professional experience of teaching international students from Europe, Asia and Africa. She is keeping up with new ideas, methods and trends in the field of education through Erasmus+ teaching mobilities in numerous higher education institutions, practical trainings and participation in various EU projects and other professional programmes as a lecturer and trainer at the Department for Modern Educational Methods at Varna University of Management, Bulgaria.
e-mail: nedka.dimitrova@vumk.eu
ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4615-2822
Citation (APA style): Dimitrova, N. (2017). Diversity and impact of national culture on undergraduate students’ learning styles. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 2, 139-151. doi: 10.46687/SILC.2017.v02.012
Link: https://silc.fhn-shu.com/images/issues/2017/SILC_2017_2_139_151_13_EN.pdf
Abstract: With the rapid process of globalisation since the beginning of the 21st century, education and businesses face the challenge of intensifying multiculturalism. Higher education institutions in Europe are expected to play a particularly important role in facilitating this process. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between national culture and the preferred learning styles in the context of Higher Education as well as to find out specific patterns of cultural influence on individual learning preferences. It aims to identify practical implications for teachers and trainers in a culturally diverse environment. The empirical investigation was based on D. Kolb’s Experiential learning theory (ELT, Kolb 1984) and G. Hofstede’s (1980) work on National and Organisational dimensions of culture.
Key words: Kolb, learning styles, Hofstede, cultural dimensions, cultural impact, higher education
References:
Barmeyer C. I. 2000. Interkulturelles Management und Lernstile. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/New York.
Cohen E., Brody C. and Sapon-Shevin M. 2004. Teaching cooperative learning. State University of New York Press, Albany.
Fridland G. H. 2002. Adult learning styles and cultural backgrounds: a comparison of the learning style preferences of American тeachers of English as a second language and Chinese тeachers of English as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Memphis, TN.
Hofstede G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: international differences in workrelated values. SAGE Publications, The University of Michigan.
Hofstede G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: international differences in workrelated values. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Rev.
Hofstede G., Hofstede G. and Minkov M. 2010. Cultures and Organizations. Mc Graw-Hill, New York. 3rd Edn.
Holtbrügge D. and Mohr A. 2010. Cultural determinants of learning style preferences. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(4): 622-637.
Hoppe M. 1990. A comparative study of country elites: international differences in work-related values and learning and their implications for management training and development. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Jaju A., Kwak H. and Zinkhan G. M. 2002. Learning styles of undergraduate business students. A cross-cultural comparison between the US, India and Korea. Marketing Education Review, 12(2): 49-60.
Joy S. and Kolb D. 2009. Are there cultural differences in learning style? International Journal of Intercultural Relations. Elsevier, The University of Michigan, pp. 4-5.
Kolb D. A. 1984. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Kolb’s learning style inventory. Stanford.edu. <https://aim.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Kolb-Learning-Style-Inventory.pdf> [Accessed 26 April 2017].
Kolb A., Kolb D. 2005. Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education.
Lum L., Bradley P. and Rasheed N. 2011. Accommodating learning styles in international bridging education programs. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 1(2): 147-168.
Mehigan K. 2005. The strategy toolbox: a ladder to strategic teaching. The Reading Teacher, 58(6): 552-566.
Montgomery S. and Groat L. 1998. Student learning styles and their implications for teaching. The Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, 10: 4-5.
Powell W., Kusuma-Powell O.2015. Overcoming resistance to new ideas. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(8): 66-69.
Sheehan M. and Kearns D. 1995. Using Kolb: implementation and evaluation of facilitation skills. Industrial and Commercial Training, 27(6): 8-14.
Socscistatistics.com. One-Way ANOVA Calculator. <http://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/anova/Default2.aspx> [Accessed 12 June 2017].
Thompson, Chapman: Thompson M. and Chapman A. 2008-2013. Concept and principles of experiential learning activities. MTA International, 2008-2013. Businessballs.com. <http://www.businessballs.com/experiential_learning.htm> [Accessed 21 Aug. 2017].
Yamazaki Y. 2005. Learning styles and typologies of cultural differences: a theoretical and empirical comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(5): 521-548.