METADATA
Title: Raising EFL students’ awareness of pragmatic conventions in forming intercultural competence
Vol. 2, 2017, pp. 169-183.
DOI: 10.46687/SILC.2017.v02.014
Author: İsmail Erton
About the author: Department of Translation and Interpretation, Atılım University, Ankara, Turkey
e-mail: ismail.erton@atilim.edu.tr
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7057-6924
Citation (APA style): Erton, İ. (2017). Raising EFL students’ awareness of pragmatic conventions in forming intercultural competence. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 2, 169-183. doi: 10.46687/SILC.2017.v02.014
Link: https://silc.fhn-shu.com/images/issues/2017/SILC_2017_2_169_183_15_EN.pdf
Abstract: For almost half a century, teaching and learning a language and even the linguistic studies related to them were elaborated in a structural framework. Both the focus on teaching/learning methods and the linguistic corpus offered within such curricula were far from that of developing EFL students’ cross-cultural interactions. This paper suggests that the implementation of a pedagogy of pragmatics in foreign language instruction facilitates the development of intercultural competence and activates the cross-cultural schemata of the learners. The pragmatically-oriented social behavior which embodies political, sociocultural and economic conventions can be integrated into the EFL curriculum via translation, literary studies and digital multimedia technology. It is shown that, by forming intercultural competence, language learners can feel more secure in communicative practices within various sociocultural contexts and, thus, the significance of teaching and learning pragmatic knowledge to master the skills in a foreign language should be emphasized as not only a fundamental principle in linguistic practices, but also as an ultimate goal in EFL instruction.
Key words: Linguistics, pragmatics, pragmatic competence, intercultural competence, foreign language teaching, foreign language learning, curriculum, communication, schemata
References:
Abolfathiasl H. and Abdullah N. A. 2015. Pragmatic consciousness raising activities and EFL learners’ speech act performance of making suggestions. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 6(2), March: 333-342.
Araja A. and Aizsila A. 2010. Intercultural communicative competence. Research for rural development. International Scientific Conference, 2: 220-224.
Atay D. T., Kurt G. T., Çamlıbel Z. T., Ersin P. T. and Kaslıoğlu Ö. T. 2009. The role of intercultural competence in foreign language teaching. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education (INUJFE), 10(3): 123-135.
Bachman L. F. 1990. Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bardovi-Harlig K. and Griffin R. 2005. L2 pragmatic awareness: evidence from the ESL classroom. System, 33(3): 401-415.
Brown D. H. 2007. Principles of language learning and teaching. Longman, White Plains.
Canale M. and Swain M. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, I(1): 1-47.
Canale M. 1983. From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In: Richards J. C. and Schmidt R. W. (eds.). Language and communication. pp. 2-27.
Chomsky N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. M.I.T, Massachusetts.
Choraih M. A., Loutfi A. and Mansoor A. 2016. The importance of pragmatic competence in the EFL curriculum: application and implications. Arab World English Journal, 7(4): 183-195.
Common European framework of reference for languages 2001. Learning, teaching, assessment. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.
Crystal D. 2008. Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. WileyBlackwell, Malden, MA.
Elosúa M. R. 2015. Intercultural competence in the education process. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(1): 72-83.
Erikson E. H. 1950. Childhood and society. W. W. Norton, New York.
Fodor J. A. and Garrett M. F. 1966. Some reflections on competence and performance. In: Lyons J. and Wales R. J. (eds.). Psycholinguistics papers: the proceedings of the 1966 Edinburgh conference. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Fukuya Y. J. and Martyn K. C. 2001. A comparison of input enhancement and explicit instruction of mitigators. University of Hawai’i at Manoa < http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503649.pdf> [Accessed 2 Apr. 2017]
Gómez Rodríguez L. 2014. Relational teaching: A way to foster EFL learners’ intercultural communicative competence through literary short stories (research). [“Enseñanza relacional: una forma de desarrollar la competencia comunicativa intercultural de estudiantes de inglés como lengua extranjera a través de cuentos literario”]. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(2): 135-150.
Gumperz J. J. and Dell H. H. Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Hymes D. H. 1972. On communicative competence. In: Holmes J. and Pride J. B. (eds.). Sociolinguistics: selected readings. Penguin Books Ltd, Baltimore, pp. 269-293.
Ishihara N., Cohen A. D. 2010. Teaching and learning pragmatics: where culture and language meet. Pearson Education, Harlow.
Kasper G. 1997. Can pragmatic competence be taught? (Network#6). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. < http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW06> [Accessed 28 March 2017]
Kasper G. and Rose K. R. 2002. Pragmatic development in a second language. Language Learning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies, vol. 52. EBSCOhost, <search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED476838& site=ehost-live.> [Accessed 2 Apr. 2017]
Krisnawati E. 2011. Pragmatic competence in the spoken English classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1): 105-115.
Leech G. N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. Longman, London.
Lenchuk I. and Ahmed. A. 2013. Teaching pragmatic competence: a journey from teaching cultural facts to teaching cultural awareness. TESL Canada Journal, 30(7), Special Issue: 82-97.
Mey L. 1993. Jacob pragmatics: an introduction. Blackwell, Oxford.
Moeller A. K. and Nugent K. 2014. Building intercultural competence in the language classroom. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Faculty Publications: Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education. < http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1160&context=teachlearnfacpub> [Accessed 16 March 2017]
Mwinyelle J. B. 2005. The acquisition of pragmatic competence in an L2 classroom: giving advice in Spanish. Diss. University of Texas at Austin. <https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/2009/mwinyellej65109.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y > [Accessed 1 Apr. 2017]
Oller Jr. J. W. 1970. Transformational theory and pragmatics. Modern Language Journal, 54(7): 504. < http://www.jstor.org/stable/321771> [Accessed 21 Feb. 2017]
Panţuru S. 2010. The informative – formative valences of multimedia technologies in the intercultural education framework. [“Valenţele informativformative ale tehnologiei multimedia în educaţia interculturală”]. Petroleum – Gas University of Ploiesti Bulletin, Educational Sciences Series, 62(1)A: 19-24.
Li R., Raja R. and Sazalie A. 2015. The relationship between motivation and pragmatic awareness: a case study of Chinese EFL learners. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 21(3): 41-55.
Van Dijk T. A. 1977. Context and cognition: knowledge frames and speech act comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, 1(3): 211-231.
Wales R. J. and Marshall J. 1966. Psycholinguistics papers. In: Lyons J. and Wales R. J. (eds.). Psycholinguistics papers: the proceedings of the 1966 Edinburgh conference. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Widdowson H. G. 1963. Learning purpose and language use. Oxford University Press, Oxford.